PROCORE / LESSON PREVIEW

Learn to diagnose RFI numbering.

A learner and the Propfessor robot work through a drawing review exercise.

You’re checking the project’s RFI register.

A request for information now has a repeated prefix. Before changing the record, work out which part was typed manually and which part Procore added.

Begin the Procore lesson Procore web · RFIs · Original teaching example
Browser exercise requires no Procore account
YOU ARE TRYING A COURSE LESSON

Identify why a Procore RFI displays a repeated prefix.

Follow the example → try the task → check your reasoning → explore a Companion follow-up.

This preview demonstrates the learning format. The exercises and feedback are authored; no live AI session. Your place is saved on this browser only.

Show me the question and answer first How the Course works
01 / IN PROCORE

Read the setting. Explain the record.

You’re a project coordinator preparing an RFI register for review. Stage prefixes were enabled after some RFIs already had manually typed prefixes. One now appears as PRE-PRE-009.

With Admin permission on the project’s RFIs tool, open RFIs → Configure Settings and inspect the project-stage prefix configuration. Compare it with the RFI’s stage and existing number.

BY THE END

You can distinguish a stage prefix from text already in an RFI number, and identify the checks needed before correcting it.

This is an inspection task. Enabling stage prefixes is permanent; do not enable them on a live project as a practice step. If you do not have the required access, use the exercise below.

02 / INSPECT THE NUMBER

Where did each part come from?

Same configured stage prefix. Different existing number.

Original Propfessor teaching diagram, not a Procore screen or a connected project. Both fictional records have a stage whose configured prefix is PRE.

Choose a record to inspect
AFTER STAGE PREFIXING
Stage prefixPRE-
Existing numberPRE-009
Displayed numberPRE-PRE-009

Procore adds PRE and a separator to a number that already starts with PRE. The repeated text can come from the two prefix mechanisms, without there being two RFI records.

03 / CHECK BEFORE CHANGING

A duplicate prefix. A duplicate record?

The number alone cannot tell you that. Diagnose how the label was assembled first.

Give me a tutor hint

Split PRE-PRE-009 into the stage prefix and the pre-existing number. Which part could have been typed before stage prefixes were enabled?

Scripted hint · No AI request
You find PRE-PRE-009. What should you check first?
This is a local practice check. No changes reach Procore. Progress stays on this browser.
04 / THE COMPANION

A question from your actual screen.

The Course teaches you to trace the number. The Companion helps you work through the specific record in front of you.

Include the tool, the setting and the identifier you are investigating. Use a redacted example if the project is confidential.

EXAMPLE QUESTION

“In Procore RFIs, our number was PRE-009. After stage prefixes were enabled it became PRE-PRE-009. Is it duplicated, and what should I inspect?”

Scripted example · No live AI request
propfessor.Companion example
Procore web · RFIs · Existing number PRE-009

Check the two sources of the prefix.

The identifier is consistent with a stage prefix being added to an already prefixed number. That alone does not establish a duplicate RFI.

Inspect the record’s stage, the configured prefix and the existing number. Once confirmed, an authorised user can edit the manually entered part. Preserve the intended identifier and check references before making a correction.

Explore Procore coverage
TRY THE INSPECTION IN YOUR SOFTWARE

In an authorised Procore project with stage prefixes already enabled, inspect one RFI and explain each part of its identifier. Leave the settings unchanged. The page cannot verify your work in Procore.

Try the Excel formula task

Learn the workflow. Ask the next question.

The Course is in development. Create an account for three free Companion questions. No card required.

Sign up for three free questions